Meteorological satellites - Receiving
Receiving APT signals (Automatic Picture Transmission)
is not necessarily complicated. Still, some anterior knowledge
comes in handy, particularly to avoid desillusions later. On the
following pages, I'll try and describe some of the problems that
appear in each part:
The receiver
A key element is of course the receiver. Below, I'll discuss
some of the options available:
- Modification of commercial communication equipment
- Modification of wideband FM receivers
- 'Scanners'
- Decicated equipment
- Homemade equipment
Modification of commercial communication equipment
With the advent of wide range VHF equipment (particularly of
the 'handie'-type), many people entertain the illusion of receiving
satellites. Many times, the desillusion afterwards is at least as
big. Why? Because the signal transmitted by the weather satellites is
not really compatible with the handies. The bandwidth of the birds is
too wide for modern equipment. The resulting signal is quite noticeably
distorted.
Even though the image may be acceptable (most of the information lost
is in the clouded part), another part of the image is used to tell the
decoding software how to process (synchronize) the image. It's just
this part that is most distorted by the lack of bandwidth. The software
just fails to find the image in the audio received (even though some
of the software promises to compensate for the loss).
On the web, and in some publications, exist procedures on how to modify
the equipment to get acceptable reception. If you decide to dedicate
the receiver to satellite operation, this can be a valid solution, but
if not, consider the following:
- Normal use of the receiver
- Modifying the receiver filter - some articles advocate removing and
replacing it with a capacitor, the satellite signal will pass much
better, but for normal terrestrial communications will loose
selectivity and you will not be able to discriminate between close
spaced local signals.
- Discriminator
- The satellite signal, after passing through the filter, arrives at
the part of the circuit where it will be converted to audio signals.
This discriminator is designed to handle comm signals - narrowband.
No garantee can be made on the linearity needed to get a good
grayscale image
- The modification itself
- Don't be fooled: modern equipment is very difficult to work on. The
miniaturization makes it difficult to remove components without
damaging the circuit, without the proper equipment to do so.
Modification of commercial FM broadcast receivers
Ah well, if communications equipment is too narrow, surely
broadcast FM receivers are wide enough! And surely, the discriminator
is wide enough to receive the signal without linearity problems. Here
another problem pops up: By using a receiver as wide as an FM
receiver (150 kHz), you are inviting other signals to come in at
the same time.
Even if there is no interference, you a getting much
more noise into the receiver than in a special receiver, and this
reduces the sensitivity of the receiver in a way you cannot receive
the weak satellite signal in an acceptable way. Compare the power of
the satellite with a flashlight at 800 km!
And, now there is
actually a lot of interference! A constellation of some 30+ satellites
is using nearly the same frequencies as the metsats (OrbComm satellites),
and interfere very heavily!
Again, it is possible to modify the receiver, but keep in mind that those
things are designed for low-cost commercial work: 20,000 watt transmitters
at short range.
'Scanner' receivers
A very tempting solution is the large offer for 'scanners', that
cover la huge range of frequencies - some up to a few gigahertz. This
is a very valid option, and can offer you monitoring other frequencies
that are of interest.
The only problem here is not buying the cheapest: Many of these scanners
only offer wideband and narrowband filters. Only scanners that offer
and intermediate filter (around 50 kHz) are of use and are in fact
nearly ideal.
Dedicated receivers
On the market exist a large variety of receivers specially
designed for APT reception. These are not as cheap as the above options,
but are generally well designed for the job. Mind: quite a few of them
do
not have adequate filters to eliminate the latest OrbComm
interference! Look out...
The majority of these receivers have fixed channels, on the most
popular frequencies: 137.3, 137.4, 137.5, 137.62 and 137.85 MHz.
Some of them can be remotely controlled.
Even these receivers may have some problems - I had to modify the
discriminator of one of the more known brands to eliminate a linearity
problem and get a good reception during the complete pass. Still,
these receivers are generally a safe bet.
Homebrew equipment and kits
Again, there are quite a few sources for kits. It's a very nice
solution, as those kits contain all components necessary for a
successfull construction. Some of those may be hard to obtain separately.
The construction process is relatively foolproof, and problems are
generally limited to after-construction calibration, which is a common
problem to most homebrew work.
The last possibility, is to completely homemake the receiver. You can
either get one of the several circuits available on the web, or even
design your own. This has the advantage of the learning experience,
and the satisfaction of doing it. Without some measuring equipment, and
some experience, I would advise against it, though.
7563
(c) John Coppens ON6JC/LW3HAZ |
mail |